The FDA Approved Nuedexta ™ (dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate). It is the first drug developed specifically to treat uncontrollable laughing or crying, also called pseudobulbar affect, or PBA.
Pseudobulbar Affect (PBA), which affects those who suffer from MS (as well as other neurological diseases and conditions). It is characterized by uncontrolled, inappropriate, and/or exaggerated episodes of crying, laughing, or other emotional display, occurring with only minimal or no stimulation to such a response.
Please visit our website or on Facebook
On September 22, 2010, The FDA, approved Gilenya (fingolimod), the first oral drug for multiple sclerosis (MS). Gilenya is used to treat relapsing and remitting form of MS. The drug has been shown to significantly reduces MS attacks. However, there can be serious side effects, with possible heart, lung, and eye toxicity and increased risk of infection. Side effect can include
In the last few years, researchers have been making strides in many areas to find a cure. My feeling is that stem cells transplant therapy is the most promising path to a cure. The technique involves using autologous non-myeloablative cells to reset your immune system.
The intention of the procedure is to wipe out the immune system and then, with one’s own cells, reconstitute it with the hope that the new cells will not target myelin. The theory is to get rid of bad cells and reconstitute it with new cells from one’s own body so hopefully they haven’t been triggered yet to attach to myelin. Non-myeloablative autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation is intended for patients with relapsing-remitting MS.
Between January, 2003, and February, 2005, 21 patients were treated 17 of 21 patients (81%) improved by at least 1 point on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and five patients (24%) relapsed but achieved remission after further immunosuppression. After a mean of 37 months (range24—48 months), all patients were free from progression (no deterioration in EDSS score), and 16 were free of relapses.
Early results show Non-myeloablative autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation was able to reverses neurological deficits, but these results need to be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Studies were initiated by Richard K. Burt, MD, Associate Professor, Division of Immunotherapy Northwestern University Department of Medicine. Please Visit Disability Connections, New Treatment page to watch part 1 and 2 of Dr. Burt’s lecture on Non-myeloablative autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation or to learn more, contact Northwestern University Division of Immunotherapy.
Division Address
750 N. Lakeshore Dr., Suite 649
(312) 908-0059
(312) 908-0064 Fax
Contact Information
Source accessed June 21, 2010:
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS1474-4422%2809%2970017-1/abstract
I wanted to share an update on my previous post regarding the new drug, AMPYRA. I am excited to share this ground breaking news with you, my friends, and look forward to learning more about this medication. I would especially like to hear from anyone who may have some experience with it, and how it goes.
***** Have you taken AMPYRA? *****
We want to wish everyone a safe and fun Memorial Day weekend. Sending out many thanks to our brave military who put their lives on the line for us and the freedom we all enjoy on a daily basis.
We want to hear from you. Since its FDA approval this year, many MS patients have taken AMPYRA. Others would like to know how it’s working, how it’s helping to relieve MS symptoms. Please come share your AMPYRA experience with us.
When AMPYRA was approved by the FDA for use in March of this year, it was unknown at that time how soon it would be prescribed for use by MS patients. However, much to our happy surprise, we have heard from many who have had success with it, saying that it significantly relieves their MS symptoms, and most importantly, say that it helps them walk. This is wonderful news!
If you are looking for more information and resources about Multiple Sclerosis (MS), you can find it on our web site. We encourage you to log on to Disability Connections, and ask you to please JOIN our membership. It's FREE and will enable you to connect to and interact with others who share your unique challenges.
Given my recent experience, I thought it would be an interesting topic for a new column here on the blog. My idea is to create a venue where we can give feedback on the various medications and treatments for MS. Here is some information I found about Low-Dose Naltrexone, which I understand is prescribed to many MS patients. Have you taken it? How has it helped you? What can you tell us about it? If not, can you tell us what kind of treatment you have been undergoing, and how it’s going for you?
Low-Dose Naltrexone Finds Preliminary Benefit
for People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Naltrexone was approved by the FDA in 1984 in a 50 mg dose for the treatment of addictions to opioids and alcohol. Naltrexone prevents the effect of such drugs by blocking opioid docking sites on the cells. In doing so, naltrexone also blocks the reception of the opioid hormones that our brain and adrenal glands produce. Many body tissues have receptors for these endorphins and enkephalins, including virtually every cell of the body's immune system.
At significantly lower doses, naltrexone has been prescribed as treatment for a variety of diseases, including various types of cancers, HIV/AIDS, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS; aka Lou Gehrig’s disease), emphysema, as well as MS and other autoimmune diseases. Until recently, there has been only limited information of Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) and its benefit to treat MS.
LDN has been shown to provide symptomatic relief for MS, according to a number of recently published laboratory studies. Investigators cite the possibility that LDN increases levels of endorphins in the brain, which are the body’s natural pain relievers. Unfortunately, as noted by the investigators, due to study dropouts and incomplete data, they had complete data on only 60 of the 80 original participants, which weakened the statistical power of the trial results. It was suggested that their findings require confirmation in a larger, multi-center clinical trial.